The Law of Rent predates Henry George, but it was George who first pointed out that with the growth of cities particular lands gain value just because of the surrounding community.
As it turns out, things work pretty much the same way in the “Second Life” virtual world as in the physical one:
Land owners often pay people to hang around their parcel. This increases traffic at their business and consequently increases their rank in Second Life’s search engine.
From Recursive Instruments.
is the title of a thoughtful essay at Thomas Paine’s Corner.
“Keep in mind, Henry George said, land is inert. So are landlords…”
Couldn’t have said it better.
All ecosystems, including financial ones, start out simple and become more complex. For governments working in affordable housing this is exasperating; no sooner is one initiative added to the repertoire than another market niche appears, another funding gap arises, another stakeholder group presses a valid claim. Government is constantly hoping or the universal programme that can simply be created and then funded increasingly hereafter, but this is impossible because ecosystemic complexity continuously increases.
So says David Smith, “founder of the American Affordable Housing Institute and a leading expert on international housing markets,” in a paper for the [apparently unrelated] Smith Institute.
The AAHI no longer exists (though there is a sort of successor here.) So I’m not sure where to ask the question: Have you considered the elimination of taxes on housing, and all other useful products of labor, as a way to address the problem? Why wouldn’t that provide a permanent solution?