<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Menace of Privilege &#187; Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menaceofprivilege.com/tag/republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menaceofprivilege.com</link>
	<description>While privilege exists, justice can&#039;t be achieved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Measuring the costs of political corruption</title>
		<link>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2010/02/measuring-the-costs-of-political-corruption/</link>
		<comments>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2010/02/measuring-the-costs-of-political-corruption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[corporate privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government gone wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menaceofprivilege.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying to do some investment research, I got diverted to a couple of articles from the Review of Financial Studies. In Corruption, Political Connections, and Municipal Finance, the authors assert that &#8220;Higher state corruption is associated with greater credit risk and higher bond yields.&#8221;  They apparently can measure the corruption and the cost; however the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to do some investment research, I got diverted to a couple of articles from the <a title="Review of Financial Studies" href="http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/" target="_blank">Review of Financial Studies</a>.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/22/7/2873?maxtoshow=&amp;hits=10&amp;RESULTFORMAT=&amp;fulltext=corruption&amp;searchid=1&amp;FIRSTINDEX=0&amp;sortspec=date&amp;resourcetype=HWCIT" target="_blank">Corruption, Political Connections, and Municipal Finance</a>, the authors assert that &#8220;Higher state corruption is associated with greater credit risk and higher bond yields.&#8221;  They apparently can measure the corruption and the cost; however the actual article is behind a paywall. I wonder if their results allow us to estimate how many dollars Illinoisans pay in higher debt service due to our political culture, or if the current estimate of &#8220;lots and lots&#8221; is sufficient.</p>
<p><a href="http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/22/6/2331" target="_blank">Do Politically Connected Boards Affect Firm Value</a>? might not seem to be a question worth asking, but it&#8217;s nice that academics have, they say, hand-classified corporate board members as &#8220;politically connected&#8221; to either of the two dominant U S parties. They find that nomination of a politically-connected individual to a board tends to increase stock prices, and that after the 2000 election, stocks associated with Republican boards went up, whereas those associated with Democrats went down.  Again, I cannot see the original article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2010/02/measuring-the-costs-of-political-corruption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

