<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Menace of Privilege &#187; intellectual meltdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menaceofprivilege.com/tag/intellectual-meltdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menaceofprivilege.com</link>
	<description>While privilege exists, justice can&#039;t be achieved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not much progress in 112 years</title>
		<link>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2009/01/not-much-progress-in-112-years/</link>
		<comments>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2009/01/not-much-progress-in-112-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>taxpayer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Georgist/geoist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic meltdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual meltdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxpayer.wordpress.com/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even on matters such as in other sciences have long since been settled, he who today looks for the guidance of general acceptance in political economy will find a chaos of discordant opinions. - Henry George, 1897 How many fields [other than economics] are there in which a big practical question pops up and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Even on matters such as in other sciences have long since been settled, he who today looks for the guidance of general acceptance in political economy will find a chaos of discordant opinions.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:right;"><a title="Science of Political Economy" href="http://savingcommunities.org/docs/george.henry/speintro.html" target="_blank">- Henry George, 1897</a></p>
<blockquote><p>How many fields [other than economics] are there in which a big practical question pops up and the Nobel-level guys are on opposite sides yelling at each other?&#8230;They aren&#8217;t dickering over some minor proposal or detail. They&#8217;re talking about whether or not we should dump nearly a trillion dollars&#8217; worth of stimulus money into the economy. And it isn&#8217;t a question that should be sitting at the far cutting edge of research, like how many dimensions your string theory needs to have. The raison d&#8217;etre of the discipline is to deal with stuff like this.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align:right;">&#8211; <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=01&amp;year=2009&amp;base_name=i_got_a_hand_so_i_got_a_fist_s" target="_blank">Ezra Klein, 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2009/01/not-much-progress-in-112-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

