<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Menace of Privilege &#187; imaginary property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menaceofprivilege.com/tag/imaginary-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menaceofprivilege.com</link>
	<description>While privilege exists, justice can&#039;t be achieved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lava Lamps patent-free too?</title>
		<link>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2008/07/lava-lamps-patent-free-too/</link>
		<comments>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2008/07/lava-lamps-patent-free-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>taxpayer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chicagoland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual property, which I think is neither]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imaginary property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lava lamp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxpayer.wordpress.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sidebar in today&#8217;s Chicago Tribune certainly implies that, like Coca-Cola, lava lamps are manufactured without patent protection, but as a trade secret.  Invented in 1963, the lava lamp&#8217;s patent would long since have expired (tho lawyers seem to know ways to effectively extend such things). btw, the manufacturer says it isn&#8217;t officially called a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a title="Lava Lamp a trade secret" href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-tue-lava-lamp-box-jul01,0,6279039.story" target="_blank">sidebar</a> in today&#8217;s Chicago Tribune certainly implies that, like Coca-Cola, lava lamps are manufactured without patent protection, but as a trade secret.  Invented in 1963, the lava lamp&#8217;s patent would long since have expired (tho lawyers seem to know ways to effectively extend such things).</p>
<p>btw, the manufacturer says it isn&#8217;t officially called a &#8220;lava lamp,&#8221; but rather a &#8220;Lava brand motion lamp.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://menaceofprivilege.com/2008/07/lava-lamps-patent-free-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

